Several R-packages to deal with spatiotemporal count areal data are currently available. Each package is based on different models and/or statistical methodologies. Unfortunately, results generated by these models are rarely comparable due to differences in notation and methods which ultimately hinder the robustness and effectiveness of such models. These models have become crucial nowadays, because their ability to analyze COVID-19 related data. This prompted us to revisit three spatiotemporal count models and monitor their performance under the same conditions (on a same data set and under a consensus notation). The three different models assessed are representative of the main two extended methodologies used to analyse spatiotemporal count data i.e., the classical approach (based on Penalised Likelihood meanwhile and based to Estimating Equations) and the Bayesian point of view. As a case study, we have used these packages to analyze COVID-19 data corresponding to 24 health regions within the Valencian Community, Spain. In particular, daily COVID-19 positive individuals are used to predict daily hospitalisations. Data corresponds to the period from 28 of June to 13 of December 2020.
翻译:目前已有若干处理时空统计数据的R包件,每个包件都以不同的模型和/或统计方法为基础,不幸的是,这些模型产生的结果很少具有可比性,因为这些模型在标记和方法上的差异最终会妨碍这些模型的健全性和有效性。这些模型现在变得至关重要,因为它们能够分析COVID-19相关数据。这促使我们重新审视三个时空统计模型,并在同一条件下(在相同的数据集和协商一致的标记下)监测其性能。所评估的三种不同模型代表了用来分析时空统计数据的主要两种扩大方法,即古典方法(同时基于惩罚性亲近性并基于估计等值)和巴耶斯观点。作为案例研究,我们利用这些包件分析了西班牙巴伦西亚社区24个卫生区相应的COVID-19数据。特别是每天使用COVID-19阳性个人来预测每日住院情况。数据与2020年6月28日至12月13日期间的数据相吻合。