The integrity of a sport can be seriously undermined if its rules punish winning as this creates incentives for strategic manipulation. Therefore, a sports tournament can be called unfair if the overall win probabilities are not ordered according to the teams' ranking based on their past performances. We present how statistical methods can contribute to choosing a tournament format that is in line with the above axiom. In particular, the qualification for the 2020 UEFA European Championship is shown to violate this requirement: being a top team in the lowest-ranked League D of the 2018/19 UEFA Nations League substantially increases the probability of qualifying compared to being a bottom team in the higher-ranked League C. The unfairness can be remarkably reduced or even eliminated with slightly changing the path formation policy of the UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs. The misaligned design has severely punished a team for winning a match years before. Since the deficiency is an inherent feature of the qualifying process, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) should reconsider the format of future tournaments to eliminate the unfair advantage enjoyed by certain teams.
翻译:因此,如果体育比赛的比赛规则对赢家给予惩罚,从而产生战略操纵的激励因素,那么,如果体育比赛的总体赢概率不是根据球队以往的成绩排列的,那么体育比赛就可以说不公平。我们介绍统计方法如何有助于选择符合上述轴心的比赛形式。特别是,2020年欧洲足联欧洲锦标赛的资格证明违反了这一要求:作为2018/19年欧洲足联排名最低的D联盟的顶级球队,与成为排名较高的C联盟的底球队相比,获得比赛资格的可能性大增。如果略微改变欧洲足联2020年欧洲足联的资格决赛政策,则不公平现象会显著减少,甚至消除。这种不协调的设计严厉惩罚了球队在多年前赢得比赛的资格。由于资格过程的固有特征,欧洲足球协会联盟(欧足联)应重新考虑今后比赛的形式,以消除某些球队享有的不公平优势。