Human factors and ergonomics are the essential constituents of teleoperation interfaces, which can significantly affect the human operator's performance. Thus, a quantitative evaluation of these elements and the ability to establish reliable comparison bases for different teleoperation interfaces are the keys to select the most suitable one for a particular application. However, most of the works on teleoperation have so far focused on the stability analysis and the transparency improvement of these systems, and do not cover the important usability aspects. In this work, we propose a foundation to build a general framework for the analysis of human factors and ergonomics in employing diverse teleoperation interfaces. The proposed framework will go beyond the traditional subjective analyses of usability by complementing it with online measurements of the human body configurations. As a result, multiple quantitative metrics such as joints' usage, range of motion comfort, center of mass divergence, and posture comfort are introduced. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework, two different teleoperation interfaces are considered, and real-world experiments with eleven participants performing a simulated industrial remote pick-and-place task are conducted. The quantitative results of this analysis are provided, and compared with subjective questionnaires, illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
翻译:人类因素和人类工程学是远程操作界面的基本组成部分,它会大大影响人类操作者的性能。因此,对这些要素进行定量评价以及为不同的远程操作界面建立可靠的比较基础的能力,是选择最适合特定应用的界面的关键。然而,迄今为止,大多数远程操作工作都侧重于这些系统的稳定性分析和透明度改进,而没有涵盖重要的可用性方面。在这项工作中,我们提出一个基础,为在使用多种远程操作界面时分析人类因素和人类工程学建立一个总框架。拟议的框架将超越对可用性的传统主观分析,补充对人体结构配置的在线测量。因此,引入了多种量化指标,如联合使用、运动舒适范围、大规模差异中心以及姿势舒适度等。为了展示拟议框架的潜力,我们考虑了两个不同的远程操作界面,并与11名参与者进行了现实世界实验,进行了模拟工业远程选择和定位任务。本项分析的量化结果与拟议主观问卷比较,与拟议的主观问卷比较。