Some of the most popular decentralised cryptocurrency networks have drawn widespread criticism for consuming vast amounts of electricity and have thus become targets of regulatory interest. Attempts to influence cryptocurrency network operations via policy in the pursuit of sustainability in the past, however, have been widely unsuccessful. Some were abandoned out of fear of jeopardising innovation while others failed due to the highly globalised nature of decentralised systems. In search of a more effective angle for energy policy measures, this study follows a consumer-focused approach by analysing the sentiments of Nigerian cryptocurrency users (${N=158}$) regarding their perceptions of the sustainability of Bitcoin, an archetypal cryptocurrency with high electricity consumption. Three main findings emerged: 1) Despite self-reporting as highly knowledgeable, most participants significantly underestimated the energy demand of Bitcoin. 2) Those who accurately assessed the energy demand of Bitcoin were more likely to support measures targeting its energy demand than those who misestimated it. 3) Those who supported measures predominantly held private actors responsible. In light of these findings, we conclude that the primary task of policymakers in the context of cryptocurrency sustainability may be to improve consumer education.
翻译:一些最受欢迎的分散化地下货币网络因消耗大量电力而遭到广泛批评,因而成为监管利益的对象。然而,过去试图通过政策影响加密货币网络运作以追求可持续性的努力却普遍没有成功。有些由于害怕损害创新而被遗弃,而另一些则由于高度全球化的分散化系统的性质而失败。为寻找能源政策措施的更有效角度,本研究报告采取以消费者为重点的方法,分析尼日利亚加密货币用户对消费高的老旧地下货币货币比特币可持续性的看法({N=158美元),分析尼日利亚加密货币用户对这种货币可持续性的看法。我们的结论是,尽管自我报告知识丰富,但大多数参与者大大低估了比特币的能源需求。(2) 准确评估比特币能源需求的人比误估能源需求的人更有可能支持针对其能源需求的措施。(3) 那些支持主要由私人行为者负责的措施的人。根据这些调查结果,我们的结论是,决策者在低价货币可持续性方面的首要任务可能是改进消费者教育。