This paper develops and investigates the impacts of multi-objective Nash optimum (user equilibrium) traffic assignment on a large-scale network for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) in a microscopic traffic simulation environment. Eco-routing is a technique that finds the most energy efficient route. ICEV and BEV energy consumption patterns are significantly different with regard to their sensitivity to driving cycles. Unlike ICEVs, BEVs are more energy efficient on low-speed arterial trips compared to highway trips. Different energy consumption patterns require different eco-routing strategies for ICEVs and BEVs. This study found that eco-routing could reduce energy consumption for BEVs but also significantly increases their average travel time. The simulation study found that multi-objective routing could reduce the energy consumption of BEVs by 13.5, 14.2, 12.9, and 10.7 percent, as well as the fuel consumption of ICEVs by 0.1, 4.3, 3.4, and 10.6 percent for "not congested", "slightly congested", "moderately congested", and "highly congested" conditions, respectively. The study also found that multi-objective user equilibrium routing reduced the average vehicle travel time by up to 10.1% compared to the standard user equilibrium traffic assignment for the highly congested conditions, producing a solution closer to the system optimum traffic assignment. The results indicate that the multi-objective eco-routing can effectively reduce fuel/energy consumption with minimum impacts on travel times for both BEVs and ICEVs.
翻译:本文开发和调查多目标Nash最佳(用户平衡)交通分配对电池电动车辆和内燃机车辆大型网络在微显性交通模拟环境中对电池电动车辆和内燃机车辆大型网络的影响。生态路线是一种技术,找到最节能的路线。ICEV和BEV的能源消费模式在对驾驶周期的敏感性方面差别很大。与ICEV不同,BEV对低速动脉旅行的能源效率比公路旅行要高。不同的能源消费模式要求对电动电动车辆和内燃机车辆的大型网络采取不同的生态路线战略。这项研究发现,生态路线可以减少BEV的能源消耗量,但也会大大增加平均旅行时间。多目标路线选择可以减少BEV的能源消耗量,减少13.5、14.2、12.9和10.7%,以及ICEV的燃料消耗量为0.1、4.3、3.4和10.6%,“不凝固的”的能源消费模式需要不同的生态路线战略。“简化 ”,“规则化的路线可以有效地减少BEV的能源流耗耗耗耗损率,并分别减少对用户平均的交通的频率进行更精确的频率分析。