As safety-critical autonomous vehicles (AVs) will soon become pervasive in our society, a number of safety concepts for trusted AV deployment have been recently proposed throughout industry and academia. Yet, agreeing upon an "appropriate" safety concept is still an elusive task. In this paper, we advocate for the use of Hamilton Jacobi (HJ) reachability as a unifying mathematical framework for comparing existing safety concepts, and propose ways to expand its modeling premises in a data-driven fashion. Specifically, we show that (i) existing predominant safety concepts can be embedded in the HJ reachability framework, thereby enabling a common language for comparing and contrasting modeling assumptions, and (ii) HJ reachability can serve as an inductive bias to effectively reason, in a data-driven context, about two critical, yet often overlooked aspects of safety: responsibility and context-dependency.
翻译:由于安全关键自主车辆(AVs)将很快在我们的社会中变得十分普遍,最近在整个行业和学术界提出了一些可靠的AV部署安全概念,然而,商定一个“适当”的安全概念仍是一项难以完成的任务。 在本文件中,我们主张将汉密尔顿·雅各布(HJ)可实现性作为比较现有安全概念的统一数学框架,并提议以数据驱动的方式扩大其示范场所的方法。 具体地说,我们表明:(一) 现有的主要安全概念可以嵌入HJ可达性框架,从而能够形成一种用于比较和对比模型假设的共同语言,以及(二) HJ可实现性可以作为一种暗示上的偏差,在以数据驱动的背景下,有效地说明安全的两个关键但往往被忽视的方面:责任和背景依赖性。