Artificial intelligence (AI) is supposed to help us make better choices. Some of these choices are small, like what route to take to work, or what music to listen to. Others are big, like what treatment to administer for a disease or how long to sentence someone for a crime. If AI can assist with these big decisions, we might think it can also help with hard choices, cases where alternatives are neither better, worse nor equal but on a par. The aim of this paper, however, is to show that this view is mistaken: the fact of parity shows that there are hard limits on AI in decision making and choices that AI cannot, and should not, resolve.
翻译:人工智能(AI)应该帮助我们做出更好的选择。 其中一些选择很小, 比如工作途径或听音乐。 其他人很大, 比如疾病治疗方法或犯罪判决时间长。 如果AI可以帮助做出这些重大决定, 我们可能会认为它也能帮助我们做出艰难的选择, 选择方法既不更好、更差,也不平等, 但程度相当。 然而,本文的目的是要表明这种观点是错误的:平等的事实表明,AI在决策上和选择上存在难以逾越的限制,而AI是不能解决的,也不应该解决的。