Over the past decades, quantum technology has seen consistent progress, with notable recent developments in the field of quantum computers. Traditionally, this trend has been primarily seen as a serious risk for cryptography; however, a positive aspect of quantum technology should also be stressed. In this regard, viewing this technology as a resource for honest parties rather than adversaries, it may enhance not only the security, but also the performance of specific cryptographic schemes. While considerable effort has been devoted to the design of quantum-resistant and quantum-enhanced schemes, little effort has been made to understanding their physical security. Physical security deals with the design and implementation of security measures fulfilling the practical requirements of cryptographic primitives, which are equally essential for classic and quantum ones. This survey aims to draw greater attention to the importance of physical security, with a focus on secure key generation and storage as well as secure execution. More specifically, the possibility of performing side-channel analysis in the quantum world is discussed and compared to attacks launched in the classic world. Besides, proposals for quantum random number generation and quantum physically unclonable functions are compared to their classic counterparts and further analyzed to give a better understanding of their features, advantages, and shortcomings. Finally, seen from these three perspectives, this survey provides an outlook for future research in this direction.
翻译:在过去几十年中,量子技术取得了持续的进展,在量子计算机领域取得了显著的近期发展;传统上,这一趋势主要被视为对加密技术的一种严重风险;然而,量子技术的一个积极方面也应得到强调;在这方面,将这种技术视为诚实各方而不是对手的资源,不仅可以加强安全,而且可以加强具体加密方法的性能;虽然在设计量子抗量和量子增强计划方面作出了相当大的努力,但很少努力去了解其实体安全; 实体安全涉及设计和实施安全措施,满足加密原始技术的实际要求,这对于经典和量子都同样重要; 本次调查旨在更加注意实体安全的重要性,重点是关键生成和储存的安全以及安全执行; 更具体地说,讨论在量子世界中进行侧门分析的可能性,并与在经典世界中发起的攻击作比较; 此外,关于量子随机数生成和量子物理上不可调的功能的建议,与它们的典型对应方相比,与它们的典型的对应方进行了比较,并进一步分析,以便更好地了解其未来前景、优势和缺点。