Capturing the uncertainty in probabilistic wind power forecasts is challenging, especially when uncertain input variables such as the weather, play a role. Since ensemble weather predictions aim to capture the uncertainty in the weather system, they can be used to propagate this uncertainty through to subsequent wind power forecasting models. However, as weather ensemble systems are known to be biased and underdispersed, meteorologists post-process the ensembles. This post-processing can successfully correct the biases in the weather variables but has not been evaluated thoroughly in the context of subsequent forecasts, such as wind power generation forecasts. The present paper evaluates multiple strategies for applying ensemble post-processing to probabilistic wind power forecasts. We use Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) as the post-processing method and evaluate four possible strategies: only using the raw ensembles without post-processing, a one-step strategy where only the weather ensembles are post-processed, a one-step strategy where we only post-process the power ensembles, and a two-step strategy where we post-process both the weather and power ensembles. Results show that post-processing the final wind power ensemble improves forecast performance regarding both calibration and sharpness, whilst only post-processing the weather ensembles does not necessarily lead to increased forecast performance.
翻译:测算概率性风能预测的不确定性具有挑战性,特别是在天气等不确定的投入变量发挥作用的情况下。由于各种天气预测旨在捕捉天气系统的不确定性,因此它们可以用来通过随后的风能预测模型传播这种不确定性。然而,由于已知天气混合系统有偏颇和分散程度不足,气象学家在处理各种组合后就处理这些组合。这一后处理能够成功地纠正天气变量中的偏差,但在随后的预测(如风能发电预测)中却未能进行彻底评估。本文件评估了将混合后处理用于概率性风能预测的多种战略。我们使用混合模型输出统计作为后处理方法,并评价四种可能的战略:仅使用原始的集合而不经过后处理,即采用单步战略,只有天气组合可以成功纠正天气变量的偏差,而在随后的预测(如风能发电预测)中,而我们仅处理后处理权力组合的后阶段战略,以及两步战略,即我们采用混合后处理后处理后处理天气和精锐性预测后结果,只能显示不断改进的天气和校正结果。