Concern about income inequality has become prominent in public discourse around the world. However, studies in behavioral economics and psychology have consistently shown that people prefer not equal but fair income distributions. Thus, finding a benchmark that could be used to measure fair income distribution across countries is a theoretical and practical challenge. Here a method for benchmarking fair income distribution is introduced. The benchmark is constructed based on the concepts of procedural justice, distributive justice, and authority's power in professional sports where it is widely agreed as an international norm that the allocations of athlete's salary are outcomes of fair rules, individual and/or team performance, and luck in line with no-envy principle of fair allocation. Using the World Bank data, this study demonstrates how the benchmark could be used to quantitatively gauge whether, for a given value of the Gini index, the income shares by quintile of a country are the fair shares or not, and if not, what fair income shares by quintile of that country should be. Knowing this could be useful for those involved in setting targets for the Gini index and the fair income shares that are appropriate for the context of each country before formulating policies toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 10 and other SDGs.
翻译:然而,行为经济学和心理学的研究一贯表明,人们更喜欢不平等而公平的收入分配,因此,寻找一个可用于衡量各国公平收入分配的基准是一项理论和实际挑战。这里采用了一种衡量公平收入分配的基准方法。基准是根据程序公正、分配公正和权威在职业体育领域的权力等概念构建的,这些概念被广泛接受为一项国际准则,即运动员薪金的分配是公平规则、个人和/或团队业绩的结果,也是符合公平分配原则的运气的结果。本研究利用世界银行的数据,表明如何利用该基准定量衡量一个国家五分位的收入份额是否为公平份额或不是公平份额,如果不是公平份额,那么该国五分位收入中应当有哪些公平收入份额。了解这一点对于参与确定吉尼指数目标的人和在制订实现可持续发展目标10和其他可持续发展目标之前适合每个国家的具体情况的公平收入份额可能有用。