The idea of a social cloud has emerged as a resource sharing paradigm in a social network context. Undoubtedly, state-of-the-art social cloud systems demonstrate the potential of the social cloud acting as complementary to other computing paradigms such as the cloud, grid, peer-to-peer and volunteer computing. However, in this note, we have done a critical survey of the social cloud literature and come to the conclusion that these initial efforts fail to offer a general framework of the social cloud, also, to show the uniqueness of the social cloud. This short note reveals that there are significant differences regarding the concept of social cloud, resource definition, resource sharing and allocation mechanism, and its application and stakeholders. This study is an attempt to express a need for a general framework of the social cloud, which can incorporate various views and resource sharing setups discussed in the literature.
翻译:毫无疑问,最先进的社会云系统显示了社会云作为其他计算模式(如云、电网、同侪和志愿者计算)的补充的潜力。然而,在本说明中,我们对社会云文献进行了批判性调查,得出的结论是,这些初步努力未能提供社会云的总框架,也未能显示社会云的独特性。本简短说明表明,在社会云的概念、资源定义、资源共享和分配机制及其应用和利益攸关方方面,社会云存在重大差异。本研究试图表明需要建立社会云总框架,其中可以包括文献中讨论的各种观点和资源共享设置。