A common concern when trying to draw causal inferences from observational data is that the measured covariates are insufficiently rich to account for all sources of confounding. In practice, many of the covariates may only be proxies of the latent confounding mechanism. Recent work has shown that in certain settings where the standard 'no unmeasured confounding' assumption fails, proxy variables can be leveraged to identify causal effects. Results currently exist for the total causal effect of an intervention, but little consideration has been given to learning about the direct or indirect pathways of the effect through a mediator variable. In this work, we describe three separate proximal identification results for natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. We then develop a semiparametric framework for inference on natural (in)direct effects, which leads us to locally efficient, multiply robust estimators.
翻译:在试图从观测数据中得出因果关系推论时,一个共同关切的问题是,测量的共变体不够丰富,无法说明所有混乱来源。在实践中,许多共变体可能只是潜在相混淆机制的代理人。最近的工作表明,在某些情况下,标准“无非计量混杂”的假设失败,可以利用代用变量来查明因果关系。目前对干预的总体因果关系有结果,但很少考虑通过调解变量来了解其影响的直接或间接路径。在这项工作中,我们描述了在未计量混杂情况下自然直接和间接影响的三种分别的准结果。然后,我们开发了一个半参数框架,用以推断自然(非计量)的直接影响,从而导致我们在当地实现高效、倍增强的估量。