Over the past several years there has been a considerable research investment into learning-based approaches to industrial assembly, but despite significant progress these techniques have yet to be adopted by industry. We argue that it is the prohibitively large design space for Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), rather than algorithmic limitations per se, that are truly responsible for this lack of adoption. Pushing these techniques into the industrial mainstream requires an industry-oriented paradigm which differs significantly from the academic mindset. In this paper we define criteria for industry-oriented DRL, and perform a thorough comparison according to these criteria of one family of learning approaches, DRL from demonstration, against a professional industrial integrator on the recently established NIST assembly benchmark. We explain the design choices, representing several years of investigation, which enabled our DRL system to consistently outperform the integrator baseline in terms of both speed and reliability. Finally, we conclude with a competition between our DRL system and a human on a challenge task of insertion into a randomly moving target. This study suggests that DRL is capable of outperforming not only established engineered approaches, but the human motor system as well, and that there remains significant room for improvement. Videos can be found on our project website: https://sites.google.com/view/shield-nist.
翻译:过去几年来,对工业组装的以学习为基础的方法进行了大量研究投资,但尽管这些技术尚未被工业界采用,尽管取得了显著的进展。我们争辩说,正是深强化学习设计空间本身,而不是算法限制本身,是造成这种缺乏采纳的真正原因。将这些技术推入工业主流需要一种行业导向模式,这与学术思维模式大不相同。在本文件中,我们界定了面向工业的DRL标准,并根据一套学习方法的标准,即示范DRL,与最近建立的NIST组装基准上的专业工业集成商进行了彻底比较。我们解释了设计选择,代表了几年的调查,使我们的DRL系统在速度和可靠性上始终超越了融合基准。最后,我们的结论是我们的DRL系统与人类在随机加入目标的挑战性任务上的竞争。这项研究表明,DRL不仅能够超越既定的设计方法,而且能够超越人类发动机系统。我们的网站/网站仍然有相当大的改进空间。