Hydrogen can play an important role for decarbonization. While hydrogen is usually produced through SMR, it can also be produced through water electrolysis which is cleaner. The relative cost and carbon intensity of hydrogen production through SMR and electrolysis vary throughout the United States because of differences in the grid. While many hydrogen cost models exist, no regional hydrogen study has been conducted across the US. We studied how the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) and carbon intensity for producing hydrogen vary across the US. We looked at electrolysis technologies (Alkaline, PEM, and SOEC) and compared them to SMR. In 2020, SMR with 90 percent CCUS has a lower average LCOH and carbon intensity for hydrogen production than electrolysis by SOEC. For states with cleaner grids, hydrogen produced through SOEC has a lower carbon intensity than hydrogen produced using SMR with 90 percent CCUS. Washington has one of the lowest carbon footprints and the lowest LCOH to produce hydrogen through electrolysis (alkaline). We predict that the LCOH for hydrogen production will be 3.2 USD per kg for Alkaline, 3.1 USD per kg for PEM, and 2.6 USD per kg for SOEC by 2050 with constant electricity prices. These projected LCOHs are still higher than the LCOH for hydrogen produced through SMR with 90 percent CCUS. If electricity costs decrease to 2c per kWh, we expect to reach cost-parity with SMR with 90 percent CCUS. The results suggest that significant investment in decarbonizing the grid and lowering the cost of electricity needs to be made to make electrolysis more competitive compared to SMR.
翻译:虽然氢通常通过SMR生产,但也可以通过更清洁的水电解生产。由于电网的差异,美国各地通过SMR和电解氢生产的相对成本和碳密度各不相同。虽然存在许多氢成本模型,但美国各地没有进行区域氢氢研究。我们研究了氢气水平成本和氢生产碳密度在美国各地如何不同。我们研究了电解技术(Alkaline、PEM和SOEC),并将其与SMR进行比较。在2020年,90% CCUS的SMR平均成本和碳密度低于SMR的电解成本。对于有更清洁电网的州,通过SOEC生产的氢的碳密度低于使用SMR(90% CCUS ) 生产的氢的碳密度。华盛顿的碳足迹水平和生产氢的碳密度各不相同。我们预测,氢解技术(碱性)的LCO生产成本将达到每公斤3.2美元、90% CCUS的碳含量和碳密度的碳密度比SMR高。预计,SEM的碳生产成本将达到每公斤的3.1美元,而SMR值将比SMR为每SML。