The subreddit r/The_Donald was repeatedly denounced as a toxic and misbehaving online community, reasons for which it faced a sequence of increasingly constraining moderation interventions by Reddit administrators. It was quarantined in June 2019, restricted in February 2020, and finally banned in June 2020, but despite precursory work on the matter, the effects of this sequence of interventions are still unclear. In this work, we follow a multidimensional causal inference approach to study data containing more than 15M posts made in a time frame of 2 years, to examine the effects of such interventions within and without the subreddit. We find that the interventions had strong positive effects toward reducing the activity of problematic users both inside and outside of r/The_Donald. However, the interventions also caused an increase in toxicity and led users to share more polarized and less factual news. Additional findings of our study are that the restriction had stronger effects than the quarantine and that core users of r/The_Donald suffered stronger effects than the other users. Overall, our results provide evidence that the interventions had mixed effects and paint a nuanced picture of the consequences of community-level moderation strategies. We conclude by reflecting on the challenges of policing online platforms and by discussing implications for the design and deployment of moderation interventions.
翻译:在这项工作中,我们采用多层面因果推论方法研究含有超过15M在两年时间框架内发布的文章的数据,以审查此类干预在分红和非分红中的影响。我们发现,这些干预在减少r/The_Donald内外问题用户的活动方面产生了强烈的积极影响。然而,这些干预还导致毒性增加,并使用户分享更多两极化和不太真实的消息。我们研究的其他结论是,这些限制的影响比隔离更为严重,R/The_Donald的核心用户比其他用户受到更强烈的影响。我们通过讨论监管战略的稳定性和可持续性,我们得出了这些干预效果的混杂效应,并描绘了在社区层面部署方面的影响。