Recently, significant advancements have been made in face recognition technologies using Deep Neural Networks. As a result, companies such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Naver offer highly accurate commercial face recognition web services for diverse applications to meet the end-user needs. Naturally, however, such technologies are threatened persistently, as virtually any individual can quickly implement impersonation attacks. In particular, these attacks can be a significant threat for authentication and identification services, which heavily rely on their underlying face recognition technologies' accuracy and robustness. Despite its gravity, the issue regarding deepfake abuse using commercial web APIs and their robustness has not yet been thoroughly investigated. This work provides a measurement study on the robustness of black-box commercial face recognition APIs against Deepfake Impersonation (DI) attacks using celebrity recognition APIs as an example case study. We use five deepfake datasets, two of which are created by us and planned to be released. More specifically, we measure attack performance based on two scenarios (targeted and non-targeted) and further analyze the differing system behaviors using fidelity, confidence, and similarity metrics. Accordingly, we demonstrate how vulnerable face recognition technologies from popular companies are to DI attack, achieving maximum success rates of 78.0% and 99.9% for targeted (i.e., precise match) and non-targeted (i.e., match with any celebrity) attacks, respectively. Moreover, we propose practical defense strategies to mitigate DI attacks, reducing the attack success rates to as low as 0% and 0.02% for targeted and non-targeted attacks, respectively.
翻译:最近,在使用深神经网络的面部识别技术方面取得了显著进步。因此,微软、亚马逊和纳维尔等公司为各种应用提供了高度准确的商业面部识别网络服务,以满足最终用户的需求。然而,自然,这些技术受到持续威胁,因为几乎所有个人都可以迅速实施假冒袭击。特别是,这些袭击对认证和识别服务构成重大威胁,严重依赖其基本面部识别技术的准确性和稳健性。尽管其严重程度严重,但利用商业网络API及其强健度的深度滥用问题尚未得到彻底调查。这项工作提供了对黑箱商业面部识别面部识别网站的强健性进行的一项计量研究,以满足各种终端用户的需求。因此,我们使用5个深面部识别数据集,其中2个是我们创建的,计划发布。更具体地说,我们根据两种情景(目标和非目标)衡量袭击的绩效,并进一步分析使用忠诚、信心和相似度衡量的无目标攻击的系统行为。因此,我们分别用名点识别攻击的准确率、目标值为目标攻击率、目标攻击的准确性攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标比比比标标、目标要低,比比标、目标为80。因此,我们分别展示了99公司、目标攻击率、目标、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标攻击率、目标率、目标、目标、目标攻击率、目标攻击率比比比比标、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、降低、目标、目标、目标、比标比比标率、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、目标、比比比比比标、比标、比标率、比。