This document captures the discussion and deliberation of the FAIR for Research Software (FAIR4RS) subgroup that took a fresh look at the applicability of the FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship for research software. We discuss the vision of research software as ideally reproducible, open, usable, recognized, sustained and robust, and then review both the characteristic and practiced differences of research software and data. This vision and understanding of initial conditions serves as a backdrop for an attempt at translating and interpreting the guiding principles to more fully align with research software. We have found that many of the principles remained relatively intact as written, as long as considerable interpretation was provided. This was particularly the case for the "Findable" and "Accessible" foundational principles. We found that "Interoperability" and "Reusability" are particularly prone to a broad and sometimes opposing set of interpretations as written. We propose two new principles modeled on existing ones, and provide modified guiding text for these principles to help clarify our final interpretation. A series of gaps in translation were captured during this process, and these remain to be addressed. We finish with a consideration of where these translated principles fall short of the vision laid out in the opening.
翻译:本文件记录了FAIR研究软件(FAIR4RS)分组的讨论情况和审议情况,该分组对FAIR指导原则对科学数据管理和管理研究软件的适用性进行了新的审视,我们讨论了研究软件作为理想的可复制、开放、可使用、公认、持续和稳健的理念,然后审查了研究软件和数据的特点和实际存在的差异。这一初步条件的愿景和理解为试图翻译和解释指导原则,使之与研究软件更充分地保持一致提供了背景。我们发现,许多原则仍然相对完整,只要提供大量解释,就保持书面形式不变。这尤其是“可实现”和“可获取”的基本原则。我们发现,“互可操作性”和“可使用性”特别容易产生广泛、有时是反对的解释成文的一套解释。我们以现有原则为模型提出两项新原则,并为这些原则提供经修改的指导文本,以帮助澄清我们的最后解释。我们发现,在这一过程期间收集了一系列翻译差距,这些差距仍有待解决。我们最后要考虑的是,这些愿景是在哪些地方提出的。