Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) are expected to support autonomy, aging in place, and wellbeing in later life. For successful assimilation, it is necessary to understand factors affecting older adults Quality Evaluations (QEs) of SARs, including the pragmatic and hedonic evaluations and overall attractiveness. Previous studies showed that trust in robots significantly enhances QE, while technophobia considerably decreases it. The current study aimed to examine the relative impact of these two factors on older persons QE of SARs. The study was based on an online survey of 384 individuals aged 65 and above. Respondents were presented with a video of a robotic system for physical and cognitive training and filled out a questionnaire relating to that system. The results indicated a positive association between trust and QE and a negative association between technophobia and QE. A simultaneous exploration demonstrated that the relative impact of technophobia is significantly more substantial than that of trust. In addition, the pragmatic qualities of the robot were found to be more crucial to its QE than the social aspects of use. The findings suggest that implementing robotics technology in later life strongly depends on reducing older adults technophobia regarding the convenience of using SARs and highlight the importance of simultaneous explorations of facilitators and inhibitors.
翻译:社会辅助机器人(SARs)有望支持自主、老龄化和晚年福利。为了成功同化,有必要了解影响老年人对合成孔径雷达的质量评估(QEs)的因素,包括实用和超声波评价以及总体吸引力。以前的研究显示,对机器人的信任大大增强了QE,而技术恐惧症则大大降低了这种信任度。目前的研究旨在研究这两个因素对合成孔径雷达老年人的QE的相对影响。研究的基础是对年龄在65岁及以上的384人进行的在线调查。答复者得到了一个用于物理和认知培训的机器人系统的视频,并填写了与该系统有关的调查问卷。结果显示,信任与合成孔径雷达之间的积极联系以及技术恐惧症与合成孔径雷达之间的消极联系。同时进行的探索表明,技术恐惧症的相对影响比信任的相对影响要大得多。此外,发现机器人的实用性质量与其使用的社会方面相比,对于其QE更为关键。研究结果表明,在较晚的生活中应用机器人技术技术需要大大地减少成年人对同时探索的难度。