This paper describes an evaluation of Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) systems on problems taken from the QMLTP library of first-order modal logic problems. Principally, the problems are translated to higher-order logic in the TPTP languages using an embedding approach, and solved using higher-order logic ATP systems. Additionally, the results from native modal logic ATP systems are considered, and compared with those from the embedding approach. The conclusions are that (i) The embedding process is reliable and successful. (ii) The choice of backend ATP system can significantly impact the performance of the embedding approach. (iii) Native modal logic ATP systems outperform the embedding approach. (iv) The embedding approach can cope with a wider range modal logics than the native modal systems considered.
翻译:本文件介绍了对自动理论验证系统(ATP)对从QMLTP图书馆获取的关于一阶模式逻辑问题的问题的评价,主要的问题是,这些问题在TPTP语言中通过嵌入式方法转化为更高阶逻辑,并使用高阶逻辑ATP系统加以解决,此外,还考虑了本地模式逻辑验证系统的结果,与嵌入式方法的结果相比较,结论是:(一)嵌入过程是可靠和成功的。 (二)后端ATP系统的选择可以对嵌入式方法的性能产生重大影响。 (三)本地模式逻辑自动转换系统比嵌入式方法更能适应。 (四) 嵌入式方法可以适应比所考虑的本地模式系统范围更广的模型逻辑。