Assessing associations between a response of interest and a set of covariates in spatial areal models is the leitmotiv of ecological regression. However, the presence of spatially correlated random effects can mask or even bias estimates of such associations due to confounding effects if they are not carefully handled. Though potentially harmful, confounding issues have often been ignored in practice leading to wrong conclusions about the underlying associations between the response and the covariates. In spatio-temporal areal models, the temporal dimension may emerge as a new source of confounding, and the problem may be even worse. In this work, we propose two approaches to deal with confounding of fixed effects by spatial and temporal random effects, while obtaining good model predictions. In particular, restricted regression and an apparently -- though in fact not -- equivalent procedure using constraints are proposed within both fully Bayes and empirical Bayes approaches. The methods are compared in terms of fixed-effect estimates and model selection criteria. The techniques are used to assess the association between dowry deaths and certain socio-demographic covariates in the districts of Uttar Pradesh, India.
翻译:评估兴趣反应和一系列空间分布模型共变之间的关联,是生态回归的动力。然而,空间相关随机效应的存在可能掩盖甚至偏差性估计,因为如果不认真处理这些关联,就会产生混乱效应。虽然在实践上往往忽视了潜在的有害、混乱的问题,导致对响应与共变之间根本关联的错误结论。在时空模式中,时间层面可能成为一种新的混乱来源,问题可能更为严重。在这项工作中,我们提出了两种办法,在获得良好的模型预测的同时,处理空间和时间随机效应对固定效应的混杂影响。具体地说,有限的回归和显然----尽管实际上不是----在完全拜伊斯和实证海湾方法中都提出了使用制约的同等程序。这些方法在固定效应估计和模式选择标准方面进行了比较。这些方法被用来评估印度北方邦地区嫁妆死亡与某些社会-人口差异之间的联系。