An external human machine interface (eHMI) can be viewed as an explicit communication method for providing driving intentions of an automated driving vehicle (AV) to pedestrians. However, the eHMI may not guarantee that the pedestrians will fully recognize the intention of the AV. In this paper, we proposed that the instruction of the eHMI's rationale can help pedestrians correctly understand the driving intentions and predict the behavior of the AV, and thus their subjective feelings (i.e., dangerous feeling, trust in the AV, and feeling of relief) and decision-making are also improved. The results of an interaction experiment in a road-crossing scene indicate that the participants were more difficult to be aware of the situation when they encountered an AV w/o eHMI compared to when they encountered a manual driving vehicle (MV); further, the participants' subjective feelings and hesitation in decision-making also deteriorated significantly. When the eHMI was used in the AV, the situational awareness, subjective feelings and decision-making of the participants regarding the AV w/ eHMI were improved. After the instruction, it was easier for the participants to understand the driving intention and predict driving behavior of the AV w/ eHMI. Further, the subjective feelings and the hesitation related to decision-making were improved and reached the same standards as that for the MV.
翻译:外部人机接口(eHMI)可被视为向行人提供自动驾驶车辆驾驶意图的明确沟通方法,但是,eHMI可能无法保证行人充分认识到AV的意图。在本文件中,我们提议,对eHMI原理的指导可以帮助行人正确理解AV的驾驶意图并预测其行为及其主观感觉(即对AV的危险感觉、对AV的信任和救济感)和决策。跨路场互动实验的结果表明,参与者在遇到AV w/o eHMI时比遇到机动车辆时更难意识到他们遇到AV w/o eHMI时的情况;此外,参与者在决策时的主观感觉和犹豫态度也大大恶化。当AV使用eHMI时,与会者对AV w/eHMI的形势认识、主观感觉和决策也有所改善。在教学后,参与者较难了解他们遇到AV W/HMI时遇到AV时的情况。驱动力意识和意志预测能力也随着AH的提高而更加清晰。