Estimation of treatment effect for principal strata has been studied for more than two decades. Existing research exclusively focuses on the estimation, but there is little research on forming and testing hypotheses for principal stratification-based estimands. In this brief report, we discuss a phenomenon in which the true treatment effect for a principal stratum may not equal zero even if the two treatments have the same effect at patient level which implies an equal average treatment effect for the principal stratum. We explain this phenomenon from the perspective of selection bias. This is an important finding and deserves attention when using and interpreting results based on principal stratification. There is a need to further study how to form the null hypothesis for estimands for a principal stratum.
翻译:对主要阶层治疗效果的估计已经研究了20多年,现有的研究专门侧重于估算,但对于主要阶层基于分层的天花板的假设的形成和测试研究很少。在这个简短的报告中,我们讨论了一种现象,即对主要阶层的真正治疗效果可能不等于零,即使两种治疗在病人一级具有同样的效果,意味着对主要阶层具有平均同等待遇效果。我们从选择偏见的角度解释这种现象。这是一个重要发现,在使用和解释基于主要分层的结果时值得注意。需要进一步研究如何形成主要阶层对估计结果的无效假设。