With the European Union introducing gender quotas on corporate boards, this study investigates the impact of board gender diversity (BGD) on firms' carbon emission performance (CEP). Using panel regressions and advanced machine learning algorithms on data from European firms between 2016 and 2022, the analyses reveal a significant non-linear relationship. Specifically, CEP improves with BGD up to an optimal level of approximately 35 percent, beyond which further increases in BGD yield no additional improvement in CEP. A minimum threshold of 22 percent BGD is necessary for meaningful improvements in CEP. To assess the legitimacy of CEP outcomes, this study examines whether ESG controversies affect the relationship between BGD and CEP. The results show no significant effect, suggesting that the effect of BGD is driven by governance mechanisms rather than symbolic actions. Additionally, structural equation modelling (SEM) indicates that while environmental innovation contributes to CEP, it is not the mediating channel through which BGD promotes CEP. The results have implications for academics, businesses, and regulators.
翻译:随着欧盟引入公司董事会性别配额制度,本研究探讨了董事会性别多样性对企业碳排放绩效的影响。基于2016年至2022年欧洲企业数据,通过面板回归与先进机器学习算法的分析,揭示出显著的非线性关系。具体而言,碳排放绩效随董事会性别多样性的增加而提升,直至约35%的最优水平;超过该水平后,董事会性别多样性的进一步增加不会带来碳排放绩效的额外改善。同时,董事会性别多样性需达到22%的最低阈值才能对碳排放绩效产生实质性改进。为评估碳排放绩效结果的合理性,本研究检验了ESG争议是否影响董事会性别多样性与碳排放绩效之间的关系。结果显示无显著影响,表明董事会性别多样性的作用源于治理机制而非象征性行为。此外,结构方程模型分析表明,尽管环境创新有助于提升碳排放绩效,但其并非董事会性别多样性促进碳排放绩效的中介渠道。研究结果对学术界、企业界与监管机构均具有启示意义。