Utilizing review information to enhance recommendation, the de facto review-involved recommender systems, have received increasing interests over the past few years. Thereinto, one advanced branch is to extract salient aspects from textual reviews (i.e., the item attributes that users express) and combine them with the matrix factorization technique. However, existing approaches all ignore the fact that semantically different reviews often include opposite aspect information. In particular, positive reviews usually express aspects that users prefer, while negative ones describe aspects that users reject. As a result, it may mislead the recommender systems into making incorrect decisions pertaining to user preference modeling. Towards this end, in this paper, we propose a Review Polarity-wise Recommender model, dubbed as RPR, to discriminately treat reviews with different polarities. To be specific, in this model, positive and negative reviews are separately gathered and utilized to model the user-preferred and user-rejected aspects, respectively. Besides, in order to overcome the imbalance problem of semantically different reviews, we also develop an aspect-aware importance weighting approach to align the aspect importance for these two kinds of reviews. Extensive experiments conducted on eight benchmark datasets have demonstrated the superiority of our model as compared to a series of state-of-the-art review-involved baselines. Moreover, our method can provide certain explanations to the real-world rating prediction scenarios.
翻译:在过去几年里,利用审查信息来强化建议,即事实上审查涉及的建议系统,引起了越来越多的兴趣。因此,一个先进的部门是从文本审查中提取突出的方面(即用户表达的项目属性),并将其与矩阵因素化技术结合起来,然而,现有的方法都忽视了以下事实,即从结构上不同审查往往包括相反的信息。特别是,积极审查通常表明用户喜欢的方面,而消极审查则描述用户拒绝的方面。结果,它可能误导建议系统作出与用户偏好模式模型有关的错误决定。为此,我们提议采用“极地偏向建议”模式(称为RPR),不加区别地对待不同极地因素。具体地说,在这一模式中,正反两方面的审查被分别收集并利用来模拟用户偏爱和用户偏向的方面。此外,为了克服结构上不同审查的不平衡问题,我们也可以从一个方面认识重要性的方法来调整我们所展示的八种数据基准评估中真实方面的重要性。