The COVID-19 pandemic left its unique mark on the 21st century as one of the most significant disasters in history, triggering governments all over the world to respond with a wide range of interventions. However, these restrictions come with a substantial price tag. It is crucial for governments to form anti-virus strategies that balance the trade-off between protecting public health and minimizing the economic cost. This work proposes a probabilistic programming method to quantify the efficiency of major non-pharmaceutical interventions. We present a generative simulation model that accounts for the economic and human capital cost of adopting such strategies, and provide an end-to-end pipeline to simulate the virus spread and the incurred loss of various policy combinations. By investigating the national response in 10 countries covering four continents, we found that social distancing coupled with contact tracing is the most successful policy, reducing the virus transmission rate by 96\% along with a 98\% reduction in economic and human capital loss. Together with experimental results, we open-sourced a framework to test the efficacy of each policy combination.
翻译:COVID-19大流行在21世纪留下了独特的标志,成为历史上最严重的灾害之一,触发了全世界各国政府以广泛的干预措施作出反应,然而,这些限制带来了巨大的价格标签;各国政府必须制定抗病毒战略,平衡兼顾保护公共健康和尽量减少经济成本之间的权衡。这项工作提出了一种概率性方案编制方法,以量化主要非药物干预措施的效率。我们提出了一个基因模拟模型,其中说明了采用这些战略的经济和人力资本成本,并为模拟病毒传播和各种政策组合的丧失提供了一条端到端管道。通过对四大洲的10个国家的国家对策进行调查,我们发现,在进行接触追踪的同时,社会疏远是最成功的政策,将病毒传播率减少96 ⁇,同时减少经济和人力资源损失98 ⁇ 。再加上实验结果,我们开辟了一个框架,以测试每一种政策组合的效果。