Since the introduction of the first Bitcoin blockchain in 2008, different decentralized blockchain systems such as Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, and Corda, have emerged with public and private accessibility. It has been widely acknowledged that no single blockchain network will fit all use cases. As a result, we have observed the increasing popularity of multi-blockchain ecosystem in which customers will move toward different blockchains based on their particular requirements. Hence, the efficiency and security requirements of interactions among these heterogeneous blockchains become critical. In realization of this multi-blockchain paradigm, initiatives in building Interoperability-Facilitating Platforms (IFPs) that aim at bridging different blockchains (a.k.a. blockchain interoperability) have come to the fore. Despite current efforts, it is extremely difficult for blockchain customers (organizations, governments, companies) to understand the trade-offs between different IFPs and their suitability for different application domains before adoption. A key reason is due to a lack of fundamental and systematic approaches to assess the variables among different IFPs. To fill this gap, developing new IFP requirements specification and open-source benchmark tools to advance research in distributed, multi-blockchain interoperability, with emphasis on IFP performance and security challenges are required. In this document, we outline a research proposal study to the community to realize this gap.
翻译:自2008年引入第一个Bitcoin供应链以来,不同分散式的供应链系统,如Etheyum、Hyperledger Fabric和Corda等,已经出现了公、私无障碍的分散式的供应链系统;人们普遍承认,没有单一的供应链网络适合所有使用案例;因此,我们看到,多条供应链生态系统越来越受欢迎,客户将根据其特殊要求走向不同的供应链;因此,这些各异的供应链之间互动的效率和安全要求变得至关重要;在实现这一多条链模式的过程中,建立互操作性便利平台(IFP)的举措已经出现,旨在连接不同的供应链(a.k.a. 块链互操作性);人们普遍认为,没有任何单一的连锁链网络网络网络网络能够适应所有使用案例;因此,我们看到,多条链式供应链生态系统的生态系统越来越受欢迎,客户(组织、政府、公司)很难了解不同的国际伙伴关系服务中心之间的交易及其在采用之前对不同应用领域的适宜性;一个关键原因是缺乏基本和系统的方法来评估不同国际伙伴关系方案之间的变量;为了填补这一空白,开发新的国际伙伴关系伙伴关系-便利平台要求,在社区之间进行新的共同互操作性研究时,在传播工具方面,以交付业绩基准工具方面,我们所需的先期研究中注重。