Context: The use of standards is considered a vital part of any engineering discipline. So one could expect that standards play an important role in Requirements Engineering (RE) as well. However, little is known about the actual knowledge and use of RE-related standards in industry. Objective: In this article, we investigate to which extent standards and related artifacts such as templates or guidelines are known and used by RE practitioners. Method: To this end, we have conducted an questionnaire-based online survey. We could analyze the replies from 90 RE practitioners using a combination of closed and open-text questions. Results: Our results indicate that the knowledge and use of standards and related artifacts in RE is less widespread than one might expect from an engineering perspective. For example, about 45\% of the respondents working as requirements engineers or business analysts do not know at least one of the two core standard in RE. Participants in our study mostly use standards by personal decision rather than being imposed by their respective company, customer, or regulator. Beyond insufficient knowledge, we also found cultural and organizational factors impeding the widespread adoption of standards in RE. Conclusions: Overall, our results provide empirically informed insights into the actual use of standards and related artifacts in RE practice and - indirectly - about the value that the current standards create for RE practitioners.
翻译:目标:在本条中,我们调查了标准和相关手工艺品(如模板或准则)在多大程度上为RE实践者所了解和使用。方法:为此,我们进行了一次基于问卷的在线调查。我们可以结合封闭和开放文本的问题,分析90 RE从业人员的答复。结果:我们的结果表明,RE中标准和有关艺术品的知识及使用比工程学方面预期的要少。例如,作为需要工程师或商业分析师的受访者中,约有45-10%的人对RE中的两项核心标准中至少有一项没有了解。我们的研究参与者大多使用标准,而大多是个人决定而不是他们各自的公司、客户或监管者强加的标准。我们发现,除了知识不足之外,还发现文化和组织因素阻碍了RE中标准的广泛采用。结论:总体而言,我们的结果提供了实际运用标准和相关手工艺品的实证性洞察力,从而在RE实践和间接实践中创建了标准和相关手工艺品。