The present research investigates the effectiveness of using a telepresence system compared to a video conferencing system and the effectiveness of using two cameras compared to one camera for remote physical therapy. The telepresence system that was used is Telegie, which allows users to see a place in 3D through a VR headset. Using two cameras with a video conferencing system allows users to see a place from multiple angles and provides additional spatial information. These two approaches of providing users additional spatial information were examined and compared in the context of remote physical therapy through a user study with 11 physical therapists who had subject matter expertise and 76 participants who acted as physical therapy patients. We conducted detailed interviews of therapists at the end of their participation. Results showed that none of the main effects of using telepresence and using two cameras were supported via t-tests. However, additional analyses using linear mixed models with individual differences of participants controlled revealed a marginally significant positive effect of using two cameras on assessment scores from the therapists. The findings of this paper indicate that video fidelity of remote communication systems matters and therefore suggest telepresence systems should provide sufficient video clarity. Spatial ability of patients was found as a strong predictor of therapist assessments.
翻译:目前的研究调查了与视像会议系统相比使用远程现场系统的有效性,以及使用与远程物理治疗一台相机相比使用两台照相机的有效性。远程现场系统是Telegie,使用户能够通过VR耳机看到3D的位置。使用两台摄像机和电视会议系统,使用户能够从多个角度看到一个地方,并提供更多的空间信息。这两种向用户提供额外空间信息的方法,通过用户研究,在远程物理治疗方面,与11名具有主题事项专门知识的理疗师和76名作为物理治疗病人的参与者进行了比较。我们在治疗师参与结束时进行了详细的访谈。结果显示,使用远程现场和使用两台照相机的主要影响没有一个通过测试得到支持。然而,使用线性混合模型和受控制的参与者个人差异进行的额外分析表明,使用两台照相机对治疗师评估分数产生不大的积极影响。本文的调查结果表明,远程通信系统事项的视频忠诚性,因此建议远程治疗病人的远程治疗系统应当提供足够的视频清晰度。发现,病人的空间能力是强有力的预测。