The existing causal inference frameworks for identifying causal effects for longitudinal studies typically assume that time advances in discrete time steps. However, medical studies nowadays with either irregular visit times or real-time monitoring have posed threats to the existing frameworks, rendering them invalid or to the very least, inefficient usage of the data. Therefore more general and advanced theory around causal inference for longitudinal data when confounders and treatments are measured continuously across time is needed. We develop a framework to identify causal effects under a user-specified treatment regime for continuous-time longitudinal studies. We provide sufficient identification assumptions including generalized consistency assumption, sequential randomization assumption, positivity assumption, and a novel ``achievable'' assumption designed for continuous time. Under these assumptions, we propose a g-computation process and an inverse probability weighting process, which suggest a g-computation formula and an inverse probability weighting formula for identification. For practical purposes, we also construct two classes of population estimating equations to identify these two processes, respectively, which further suggest a doubly robust formula that identifies causal effects under the user-specified treatment regime with extra robustness against process misspecification.
翻译:用于确定纵向研究因果关系的现有因果推断框架通常假定时间在不定期访问时间或实时监测的情况下有进步的时间,然而,目前医学研究,无论是不定期访问时间还是实时监测,都对现有框架构成了威胁,使其无效,或是数据使用效率极低,因此,需要更笼统和先进的理论,在连续时间不断测量召集人和治疗方法时,围绕纵向数据的因果推断进行更一般和先进的理论;我们为连续时间纵向研究制定一个框架,在用户指定的治疗制度下确定因果影响。我们提供了充分的识别假设,包括普遍一致性假设、顺序随机假设、假设和为持续时间设计的新的“可实现”假设。根据这些假设,我们提议了一个计算过程和反概率加权过程,其中建议采用一种计算公式和反概率加权公式进行识别。为了实际目的,我们还为确定这两个过程分别设计了两类人口估计方程,这两类人估计公式进一步提出一种双重稳健的公式,在用户指定治疗制度下确定因果影响时,对过程的误差分不稳。