Recently, recommendation based on causal inference has gained much attention in the industrial community. The introduction of causal techniques into recommender systems (RS) has brought great development to this field and has gradually become a trend. However, a unified causal analysis framework has not been established yet. On one hand, the existing causal methods in RS lack a clear causal and mathematical formalization on the scientific questions of interest. Many confusions need to be clarified: what exactly is being estimated, for what purpose, in which scenario, by which technique, and under what plausible assumptions. On the other hand, technically speaking, the existence of various biases is the main obstacle to drawing causal conclusions from observed data. Yet, formal definitions of the biases in RS are still not clear. Both of the limitations greatly hinder the development of RS. In this paper, we attempt to give a causal analysis framework to accommodate different scenarios in RS, thereby providing a principled and rigorous operational guideline for causal recommendation. We first propose a step-by-step guideline on how to clarify and investigate problems in RS using causal concepts. Then, we provide a new taxonomy and give a formal definition of various biases in RS from the perspective of violating what assumptions are adopted in standard causal analysis. Finally, we find that many problems in RS can be well formalized into a few scenarios using the proposed causal analysis framework.
翻译:最近,基于因果推断的建议在工业界引起了很大的注意。将因果技术引入建议系统(RS)给该领域带来了巨大的发展,并逐渐成为一个趋势。然而,一个统一的因果分析框架尚未建立。一方面,塞族共和国现有的因果方法在科学利益问题上缺乏明确的因果和数学正规化。许多混淆需要澄清:确切的估算是什么,在什么目的,哪种假设,哪种技术,以及根据什么可信的假设。另一方面,在技术上,各种偏见的存在是从观察到的数据中得出因果结论的主要障碍。然而,对塞族共和国偏见的正式定义仍然不明确。这两种限制都严重妨碍了塞族共和国的发展。在本文件中,我们试图提供一个因果分析框架,以适应塞族共和国的不同情景,从而为因果建议提供有原则和严格的操作指南。我们首先提出一个分步走的指导方针,说明如何用因果概念澄清和调查塞族共和国的问题。然后,我们提供了一个新的分类,并从正式的因果框架的角度对塞族共和国的各种偏向作出正式定义。我们最后可以发现,从正式的因果分析的角度,从违反多少因果假设的角度,我们提出了多少项标准分析。