Web3 is the most hyped concept from 2020 to date, greatly motivating the prosperity of the Internet of Value and Metaverse. However, no solid evidence stipulates the exact definition, criterion, or standard in the sense of such a buzzword. To fill the gap, we aim to clarify the term in this work. We narrow down the connotation of Web3 by separating it from high-level controversy argues and, instead, focusing on its protocol, architecture, and evaluation from the perspective of blockchain fields. Specifically, we have identified all potential architectural design types and evaluated each of them by employing the scenario-based architecture evaluation method. The evaluation shows that existing applications are neither secure nor adoptable as claimed. Meanwhile, we also discuss opportunities and challenges surrounding the Web3 space and answer several prevailing questions from communities. A primary result is that Web3 still relies on traditional internet infrastructure, not as independent as advocated. This report, as of June 2022, provides the first strict research on Web3 in the view of blockchain. We hope that this work would provide a guide for the development of future Web3 services.
翻译:从2020年至今,Web3是最为杂乱的概念,极大地促进了价值和元值互联网的繁荣。然而,没有确凿的证据证明这种词的准确定义、标准或标准。为了填补这一空白,我们力求澄清这项工作中的术语。我们缩小Web3的内涵,将它与高层争议分开来争论,相反,我们侧重于其程序、架构和从块链域的角度进行评估。具体地说,我们确定了所有潜在的建筑设计类型,并通过采用基于情景的架构评价方法对其中的每一个类型进行了评估。评估表明,现有的应用程序既不安全,也无法被采纳。与此同时,我们还讨论了围绕Web3空间的各种机遇和挑战,并回答了社区提出的几个普遍问题。一个主要结果是Web3仍然依赖传统的互联网基础设施,而不是如所主张的那样独立。截至2022年6月,本报告从块链的角度首次对Web3进行了严格的研究。我们希望这项工作将为未来Web3服务的发展提供指南。