The democracy-science relationship has traditionally been examined through philosophical conjecture and single country case studies. There remains limited global scale empirical research on the topic. This study explores country level factors related to the dynamics of the global scientific research collaboration network, focusing on structural associations between democratic governance and the formation, persistence, and strength of international research collaboration ties. This study combines longitudinal data between 2008 and 2017 from the Varieties of Democracy Institute, World Bank Indicators, Scopus, and Web of Science bibliometric data. Methods of analysis include temporal and weighted exponential random graph models (ERGM). The results suggest positive significant effects of both democratic governance on international research collaboration and homophily between countries with similar levels of democratic governance. The results also show the importance of exogenous economic, population, and geo-political factors, as well as endogenous network factors including preferential attachment and transitivity.
翻译:民主-科学关系历来通过哲学猜想和单一国家案例研究加以研究,但关于这一专题的全球规模经验研究仍然有限,这项研究探讨了与全球科学研究协作网络动态有关的国家一级因素,重点是民主治理与国际研究协作关系的形成、持续和实力之间的结构性联系,这项研究将2008年至2017年民主学会、世界银行指标、斯科普斯和科学双光度数据网的纵向数据结合起来,分析方法包括时间和加权指数随机图模型(ERGM),研究结果表明民主治理对国际研究协作以及具有类似民主治理水平的国家之间同质所产生的积极重大影响,研究结果还表明外部经济、人口和地理政治因素的重要性,以及包括优惠附属和中转性在内的内在网络因素的重要性。