Evaluating change in ranked term importance in a growing corpus is a powerful tool for understanding changes in vocabulary usage. In this paper, we analyze a corpus of free-response answers where 33,993 LGBTQ Generation Z respondents from age 13 to 24 in the United States are asked to self-describe their sexual orientation. We observe that certain labels, such as bisexual, pansexual, and lesbian, remain equally important across age groups. The importance of other labels, such as homosexual, demisexual, and omnisexual, evolve across age groups. Although Generation Z is often stereotyped as homogenous, we observe noticeably different label usage when self-describing sexual orientation within it. We urge that interested parties must routinely survey the most important sexual orientation labels to their target audience and refresh their materials (such as demographic surveys) to reflect the constantly evolving LGBTQ community and create an inclusive environment.
翻译:在不断增长的《宪法》中,评估排名的术语重要性变化是理解词汇用法变化的有力工具。在本文中,我们分析了一系列免费回答,其中要求美国13至24岁的33 993名LGBTQ世代Z的受访者自我描述他们的性取向。我们看到,某些标签,如双性恋、泛性恋和女同性恋,在年龄组中仍然同等重要。其他标签,如同性恋、双性恋和全性恋等,在各年龄组间演变的重要性。虽然Z代人往往被定型为同质,但在自我描述性取向时,我们观察到明显不同的标签使用。我们敦促有关各方必须例行调查对其目标受众最重要的性取向标签,并更新其材料(如人口调查),以反映男女同性恋、双性恋、双性恋和全性恋社群的不断变化,并创造包容性的环境。