Classification is a well-studied machine learning task which concerns the assignment of instances to a set of outcomes. Classification models support the optimization of managerial decision-making across a variety of operational business processes. For instance, customer churn prediction models are adopted to increase the efficiency of retention campaigns by optimizing the selection of customers that are to be targeted. Cost-sensitive and causal classification methods have independently been proposed to improve the performance of classification models. The former considers the benefits and costs of correct and incorrect classifications, such as the benefit of a retained customer, whereas the latter estimates the causal effect of an action, such as a retention campaign, on the outcome of interest. This study integrates cost-sensitive and causal classification by elaborating a unifying evaluation framework. The framework encompasses a range of existing and novel performance measures for evaluating both causal and conventional classification models in a cost-sensitive as well as a cost-insensitive manner. We proof that conventional classification is a specific case of causal classification in terms of a range of performance measures when the number of actions is equal to one. The framework is shown to instantiate to application-specific cost-sensitive performance measures that have been recently proposed for evaluating customer retention and response uplift models, and allows to maximize profitability when adopting a causal classification model for optimizing decision-making. The proposed framework paves the way toward the development of cost-sensitive causal learning methods and opens a range of opportunities for improving data-driven business decision-making.
翻译:分类模式支持优化各种业务业务流程的管理决策;例如,采用客户周全的预测模型,通过优化选择目标客户来提高保留活动的效率;独立地提出了成本敏感和因果分类方法,以改进分类模式的绩效;前者考虑了正确和不正确的分类的好处和成本,如保留客户的惠益,而后者估计了留用运动等行动对利益结果的因果关系;本研究通过制定统一评价框架,将成本敏感和因果分类结合起来;该框架包括一系列现有和新的绩效措施,以以成本敏感和不计成本的方式评价因果分类模式和常规分类模式;我们证明,在行动数量等于一个时,常规分类是一系列业绩计量的因果分类的具体实例;框架显示的是,最近为评估客户敏感性和因果性分类而提出的具体成本敏感性的绩效措施,目的是在评估客户的敏感性和因果性反应时,采用最佳的因果性分析方法,从而采用最佳程度的因果性能分析模式; 采用最佳的因果性能分析模式,以采用拟议的因果性能决定方法,从而采用最佳地改进因果分析模式。