To non-experts, the traditional Centralized Finance (CeFi) ecosystem may seem obscure, because users are typically not aware of the underlying rules or agreements of financial assets and products. Decentralized Finance (DeFi), however, is making its debut as an ecosystem claiming to offer transparency and control, which are partially attributable to the underlying integrity-protected blockchain, as well as currently higher financial asset yields than CeFi. Yet, the boundaries between CeFi and DeFi may not be always so clear cut. In this work, we systematically analyze the differences between CeFi and DeFi, covering legal, economic, security, privacy and market manipulation. We provide a structured methodology to differentiate between a CeFi and a DeFi service. Our findings show that certain DeFi assets (such as USDC or USDT stablecoins) do not necessarily classify as DeFi assets, and may endanger the economic security of intertwined DeFi protocols. We conclude this work with the exploration of possible synergies between CeFi and DeFi.
翻译:对非专家来说,传统的中央金融(CeFi)生态系统似乎似乎模糊不清,因为用户通常不了解金融资产和产品的基本规则或协议。但是,分散金融(DeFi)作为声称提供透明度和控制的生态系统的开场白,声称提供透明度和控制,部分归因于基本的完整保护区块链,以及目前比CeFi更高的金融资产收益率。然而,CeFi和DeFi之间的界限并不总是那么明确。在这项工作中,我们系统地分析CeFi和DeFi之间的区别,包括法律、经济、安全、隐私和市场操纵。我们提供了一种结构化的方法,区分CeFi和DeFi服务。我们的调查结果显示,某些DeFi资产(如USC或USDT稳定公司)不一定被归类为DeFi资产,而且可能危及相互交织的DeFi协议的经济安全。我们完成这项工作时,将探索CeFi和DeFi之间的可能协同作用。