In recent years, multi-access edge computing (MEC) is a key enabler for handling the massive expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) applications and services. However, energy consumption of a MEC network depends on volatile tasks that induces risk for energy demand estimations. As an energy supplier, a microgrid can facilitate seamless energy supply. However, the risk associated with energy supply is also increased due to unpredictable energy generation from renewable and non-renewable sources. Especially, the risk of energy shortfall is involved with uncertainties in both energy consumption and generation. In this paper, we study a risk-aware energy scheduling problem for a microgrid-powered MEC network. First, we formulate an optimization problem considering the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) measurement for both energy consumption and generation, where the objective is to minimize the expected residual of scheduled energy for the MEC networks and we show this problem is an NP-hard problem. Second, we analyze our formulated problem using a multi-agent stochastic game that ensures the joint policy Nash equilibrium, and show the convergence of the proposed model. Third, we derive the solution by applying a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL)-based asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm with shared neural networks. This method mitigates the curse of dimensionality of the state space and chooses the best policy among the agents for the proposed problem. Finally, the experimental results establish a significant performance gain by considering CVaR for high accuracy energy scheduling of the proposed model than both the single and random agent models.
翻译:近些年来,多接入边缘计算(MEC)是处理大规模扩大Things(IoT)应用和服务互联网(IoT)应用和服务大规模扩张的关键促进因素。然而,MEC网络的能源消耗取决于引发能源需求估计风险的不稳定性任务。作为能源供应商,微型电网可以促进无缝能源供应。然而,由于可再生能源和不可再生能源的不可预测的能源生产,与能源供应有关的风险也增加了。特别是,能源短缺的风险涉及能源消耗和发电的不确定性。在本文件中,我们研究了微型电网(MEC)应用微电动MEC网络的风险意识能源时间安排问题。首先,考虑到能源消费和发电的有条件风险值(CVaR)衡量,我们制定了一个优化问题,目的是最大限度地减少MEC网络预定能源的剩余量,我们发现这个问题是一个难以解决的难题。第二,我们用一种能确保联合Sash平衡的多剂模型来分析我们形成的问题,并展示了拟议模型的趋同。第三,我们考虑将这一解决方案的解决方案与高风险值-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-风险-能源需求-能源消耗估计值-能源消耗和发电网络生成值-能源消费-能源消费-能源消费-能源消费-能源消费-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-成本-