In this study, the global scientific workforce is explored through a large-scale, generational, and longitudinal approach. We examine 4.3 million nonoccasional scientists from 38 OECD countries publishing in 1990-2021. Our longitudinal interest is in the changing distribution of young male and female scientists over time across 16 STEMM disciplines. We unpack the details of the changing scientific workforce using ten 5-year age groups within each discipline. The usefulness of global bibliometric data sources in analyzing the scientific workforce along the four dimensions of gender, age, discipline, and time is tested. Traditional aggregated data about scientists in general hide a nuanced picture of the changing gender dynamics within and across disciplines and age groups. For instance, the pivotal role of medicine in the global scientific workforce is highlighted, with almost half of all scientists (45.98%) in the OECD area being primarily involved in medical research, and more than half of female scientists (55.02%) being disciplinarily located in medicine. Limitations of bibliometric datasets are explored and global studies are compared with national-level studies. The methodological choices and their implications are shown, and new opportunities for how to study scientists globally are discussed.
翻译:翻译摘要:本研究采用大规模、跨世代、纵向的方法,探究全球科研人员队伍的多样性。我们研究了1990-2021年间,来自38个OECD国家的430万名非常规科学家。我们的纵向兴趣在于,分析16个STEMM领域中,青年男女科学家在不同年龄组之间的分布变化情况。我们测试了全球文献计量数据源在性别、年龄、学科和时间等四个维度上分析科研人员队伍方面的有用性。传统的关于科学家的聚合数据隐藏了不同学科和年龄组之间以及跨学科之间变化性别动态的细致画面。例如,强调了医学在全球科研人员队伍中的关键作用,OECD地区几乎有一半的科学家(45.98%)主要从事医学研究,超过一半的女性科学家(55.02%)所处的学科是医学。本文探讨了文献计量数据集的局限性,并将全球研究与国家级研究进行了比较。同时阐述了方法选择及其影响,并讨论了如何全球性研究科学家的新机会。