Despite extensive research in the past five years and several successfully completed and on-going pilot projects, regulators are still reluctant to implement peer-to-peer trading at a large-scale in today's electricity market. The reason could partly be attributed to the perceived disadvantage of current market participants like retailers due to their exclusion from market participation - a fundamental property of decentralised peer-to-peer trading. As a consequence, recently, there has been growing pressure from energy service providers in favour of retailers' participation in peer-to-peer trading. However, the role of retailers in the peer-to-peer market is yet to be established as no existing study has challenged this fundamental circumspection of decentralized trading. In this context, this perspective takes the first step to discuss the feasibility of retailers' involvement in the peer-to-peer market. In doing so, we identify key characteristics of retail-based and peer-to-peer electricity markets and discuss our viewpoint on how to incorporate a single retailer in a peer-to-peer market without compromising the fundamental decision-making characteristics of both markets. Finally, we give an example of a hypothetical business model to demonstrate how a retailer can be a part of a peer-to-peer market with a promise of collective benefits for the participants.
翻译:尽管在过去五年中进行了广泛的研究,并成功完成并实施了几个试点项目,但监管者仍然不愿意在当今电力市场大规模实施同侪交易,其部分原因是,零售商等当前市场参与者由于被排除在市场参与之外而被认为处于不利地位,例如零售商被排斥在市场参与之外,这是分散的同侪对同侪贸易的一个基本特性,因此,能源服务提供商最近压力越来越大,赞成零售商参与同侪贸易。然而,零售商在同侪市场中的作用尚未确定,因为现有的研究尚未对分散化贸易的这一基本偏差提出质疑。在这方面,这一视角是讨论零售商参与同侪市场的可行性的第一步。在这样做时,我们确定了零售和同侪电力市场的关键特点,并讨论了我们关于如何在不损及两个市场的基本决策特点的情况下将单一零售商纳入同侪市场的观点。最后,我们举了一个假设商业模式的例子,以展示同侪市场如何成为共同承诺的参与者。