Since computer science is still mainly male dominated, academia, industry and education jointly seek ways to motivate and inspire girls, for example by introducing them to programming at an early age. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has forced many such endeavours to move to an online setting. While the gender-dependent differences in programming courses have been studied previously, for example revealing that girls may feel safer in same-sex groups, much less is known about gender-specific differences in online programming courses. In order to investigate whether gender-specific differences can be observed in online courses, we conducted an online introductory programming course for Scratch, in which we observed the gender-specific characteristics of participants with respect to how they interact, their enjoyment, the code they produce, and the creativity exposed by their programs. Overall, we observed no significant differences between how girls participated in all-female vs. mixed groups, and girls generally engaged with the course more actively than boys. This suggests that online courses can be a useful means to avoid gender-dependent group dynamics. However, when encouraging creative freedom in programming, girls and boys seem to fall back to socially inherited stereotypical behavior also in an online setting, influencing the choice of programming concepts applied. This may inhibit learning and is a challenge that needs to be addressed independently of whether courses are held online.
翻译:由于计算机科学仍主要以男性为主,学术界、产业和教育共同寻找激励和激励女孩的方法,例如,在早期将她们引入编程;最近的COVID-19大流行迫使许多这类努力转向在线环境;虽然以前研究过方案规划课程中基于性别的差异,例如显示同性群体女孩可能感到更安全,但对于在线方案拟订课程中性别差异的了解要少得多;为了调查在网上课程中能否观察到性别差异,我们为Scratch开办了一个在线介绍课程,我们在该课程中看到参与者在互动、享受、制定守则、其方案所显示的创造性等方面具有的性别特点;总体而言,我们没有看到女孩如何参与全女性混合群体以及女孩一般比男孩更积极地参与课程之间的重大差异;这表明在线课程可能是避免性别依赖群体动态的有用手段;然而,在鼓励编程中的创造性自由时,女孩和男孩似乎又回到了社会上遗留下来的陈规定型行为,在网上环境中也影响到他们的互动、享受的守则和他们所制作的程式所展示的创造力;总体而言,我们没有看到女孩与女孩如何参与全女性混合群体以及女孩一般比男孩更积极地参与课程学习,这可能会妨碍在线学习。