A well established agenda on the research output, impact, and structure of global scientific elites such as Nobel Prize laureates has generated interest in the scientific elites from developing countries. This study deploys science mapping techniques to provide a comprehensive analysis of the output, impact, and structure of the Colombian scientific elite, i.e., researchers awarded with the Alejandro Angel Escobar Foundation National Prize 1990 2020, known locally as the Colombian Nobel. Findings showed that the Colombian scientific elite has a broader agenda than indexing titles in internationally renowned bibliographic databases. The Colombian scientific elite also showed positive growth, which is an inverse trend compared with Nobel laureate productivity. There were no noticeable changes in productivity and impact before and after receiving the prize. Institutional collaboration within the Colombian scientific elite displayed the highest betweenness (brokerage) role of world and local top-tier universities. However, only two Colombian scientific elite members published an article with two Nobel Prize laureates. Most of the research profiles reflected the national output priorities, but were found to diverge from the national focus in respect of strategic research capacities. This study also conducted a productivity and impact comparison with Nobel Prize laureates in science and economics by means of a stratified random sample 1990-2020 via the composite indicator proposed by Ioannidis et al. The interleaving of the Colombian scientific elite and Nobel Prize laureates, particularly between the 3rd and 2nd quartiles, enabled a more nuanced analysis of the local impact in the global scientific landscape.
翻译:关于诺贝尔奖获得者等全球科学精英的研究成果、影响和结构的既定议程,如诺贝尔奖获得者等全球科学精英的研究成果、影响和结构,引起了发展中国家的科学精英的兴趣。本研究运用科学绘图技术,全面分析哥伦比亚科学精英的产出、影响和结构,即哥伦比亚科学精英在亚历杭德罗·安赫尔·埃斯科瓦尔基金会1990-2020年国家奖获奖研究员,当地称为哥伦比亚诺贝尔奖获得者。研究结果显示,哥伦比亚科学精英的议程比国际知名书目数据库的索引标题更为广泛。哥伦比亚科学精英也表现出积极的增长,与诺贝尔奖获得者生产力相比是一种反向趋势。在获得奖之前和之后,生产力和影响没有明显的变化。哥伦比亚科学精英之间的机构协作展示了世界和地方顶级大学之间的最高地位(中介)和结构。然而,只有哥伦比亚的两个科学精英成员发表了一篇由两位诺贝尔奖得主撰写的文章。大多数研究简介反映了国家产出优先事项,但发现在战略研究能力方面与国家重点有差异。这项研究还比较了与诺贝尔奖获得者之间的生产力和影响。在获得奖前和获得奖后,哥伦比亚科学奖得奖者之间没有明显变化,哥伦比亚科学奖者在1990年授标第2号全球科学奖得标2号中,通过比较了比较了哥伦比亚科学奖的比较。