Sparse regression is frequently employed in diverse scientific settings as a feature selection method. A pervasive aspect of scientific data that hampers both feature selection and estimation is the presence of strong correlations between predictive features. These fundamental issues are often not appreciated by practitioners, and jeapordize conclusions drawn from estimated models. On the other hand, theoretical results on sparsity-inducing regularized regression such as the Lasso have largely addressed conditions for selection consistency via asymptotics, and disregard the problem of model selection, whereby regularization parameters are chosen. In this numerical study, we address these issues through exhaustive characterization of the performance of several regression estimators, coupled with a range of model selection strategies. These estimators and selection criteria were examined across correlated regression problems with varying degrees of signal to noise, distribution of the non-zero model coefficients, and model sparsity. Our results reveal a fundamental tradeoff between false positive and false negative control in all regression estimators and model selection criteria examined. Additionally, we are able to numerically explore a transition point modulated by the signal-to-noise ratio and spectral properties of the design covariance matrix at which the selection accuracy of all considered algorithms degrades. Overall, we find that SCAD coupled with BIC or empirical Bayes model selection performs the best feature selection across the regression problems considered.
翻译:在不同的科学环境中,经常采用偏差回归作为特征选择方法。阻碍特征选择和估计的科学数据的一个普遍方面是预测特征之间存在强烈的关联。这些基本问题往往得不到实践者的理解,而且从估计模型中得出的结论也显得微不足道。另一方面,拉索等拉索等气候诱发正常回归的理论结果,在很大程度上解决了通过无症状进行选择一致性的条件,忽视了选择模型选择的问题,从而选择了正规化参数。在本次数字研究中,我们通过对若干回归估计器的性能进行详尽的描述,并辅之以一系列模型选择战略,来解决这些问题。这些估计和选择标准是交叉相互关联的回归问题的,其信号与噪音、非零模型系数分布和模型偏移等不同程度的信号。我们的结果显示,在所有回归估计器和模型选择标准中,虚假的正负控制与虚假的负控制之间,基本上取舍。此外,我们可以从数字角度探索一个过渡点,通过信号到偏差比率和光谱选择战略。这些估计和选择标准标准标准是相关的相关回归问题,我们所考虑的系统选择标准选择标准,从而得出最佳选择标准。