Distinguishing between cause and effect using time series observational data is a major challenge in many scientific fields. A new perspective has been provided based on the principle of Independence of Causal Mechanisms (ICM), leading to the Spectral Independence Criterion (SIC), postulating that the power spectral density (PSD) of the cause time series is uncorrelated with the squared modulus of the frequency response of the filter generating the effect. Since SIC rests on methods and assumptions in stark contrast with most causal discovery methods for time series, it raises questions regarding what theoretical grounds justify its use. In this paper, we provide answers covering several key aspects. After providing an information theoretic interpretation of SIC, we present an identifiability result that sheds light on the context for which this approach is expected to perform well. We further demonstrate the robustness of SIC to downsampling - an obstacle that can spoil Granger-based inference. Finally, an invariance perspective allows to explore the limitations of the spectral independence assumption and how to generalize it. Overall, these results support the postulate of Spectral Independence is a well grounded leading principle for causal inference based on empirical time series.
翻译:利用时间序列观测数据区分因果关系是许多科学领域的一大挑战。根据“Causal机制独立”原则提供了一个新的视角,导致“SIC”的“光谱独立标准”假设:“SIS”与产生效应的过滤器频率反应的平方模量无关。由于SIC依靠的方法和假设与时间序列中大多数因果发现方法形成鲜明对比,因此它提出了理论依据的哪些理由值得使用的问题。在本文中,我们给出了几个关键方面的答案。在对SIC提供了信息理论解释之后,我们提出了一个可识别性结果,揭示了这一方法可望运行良好的背景。我们进一步展示了SIC对降序的稳健性,这是一个能够破坏Grang基于时间序列的推论的障碍。最后,从不统一的观点可以探索光谱独立假设的局限性以及如何将其概括化。总体而言,这些结果支持了Spectral独立系列的后期,这是基于一个基于一个明确的经验性原则的、基于时间序列。