In parametric Bayesian designs of early phase cancer clinical trials with drug combinations exploring a discrete set of partially ordered doses, several authors claimed that there is no added value in including an interaction term to model synergism between the two drugs. In this paper, we investigate these claims in the setting of continuous dose levels of the two agents. Parametric models will be used to describe the relationship between the doses of the two agents and the probability of dose limiting toxicity and efficacy. Trial design proceeds by treating cohorts of two patients simultaneously receiving different dose combinations and response adaptive randomization. We compare trial safety and efficiency of the estimated maximum tolerated dose (MTD) curve between models that include an interaction term with models without the synergism parameter with extensive simulations. Under a selected class of dose-toxicity models and dose escalation algorithm, we found that not including an interaction term in the model can compromise the safety of the trial and reduce the pointwise reliability of the estimated MTD curve.
翻译:在对巴伊西亚早期癌症临床试验设计中,用药物组合进行早期阶段临床试验,探索一组部分订购剂量的离散,若干作者声称,列入一个互动术语来模拟这两种药物之间的协同效应是没有附加价值的,在本文中,我们在确定两种药物的持续剂量水平时对这些主张进行调查,将使用参数模型来描述两种制剂的剂量与剂量限制毒性和功效的可能性之间的关系。通过对同时接受不同剂量组合和反应适应性随机化的两个病人的组群进行试验设计过程。我们比较了两种估计最大容许剂量(MTD)曲线的试验安全性和效率,这些模型中包括与模型的交互性术语,而没有带广泛的模拟。在选定的剂量毒性模型和剂量上升算法类别中,我们发现在模型中不包含一个互动术语会损害试验的安全性,并降低估计的MTD曲线的点性可靠性。