The concept of weak submodularity and the related submodularity ratio considers the behavior of a set function as elements are added to some current solution. By considering the submodularity ratio, strong guarantees have been obtained for maximizing various non-submodular objectives subject to a cardinality constraint via the standard greedy algorithm. Here, we give a natural complement to the notion of weak submodularity by considering how a function changes as elements are removed from the solution. We show that a combination of these two notions can be used to obtain strong guarantees for maximizing non-submodular objectives subject to an arbitrary matroid constraint via both standard and distorted local search algorithms. Our guarantees improve on the state of the art whenever $\gamma$ is moderately large, and agree with known guarantees for submodular objectives when $\gamma = 1$. As motivation, we consider both the subset selection problem, and the Bayesian A-optimal design problem for linear regression, both of which were previously studied in the context of weak submodularity. We show that these problems satisfy our complementary notion of approximate submodularity, as well, allowing us to apply our new guarantees.
翻译:微弱亚模式概念和相关的亚模式比率概念将设定功能的行为视为当前某些解决方案中添加的元素。 通过考虑亚模式比率,我们获得了强有力的保障,以最大限度地实现各种非子模式目标,但受标准的贪婪算法限制。在这里,我们通过考虑如何从解决方案中去除功能变化作为元素来给弱小模式概念以自然的补充。我们表明,这两个概念的结合可以用来获得强有力的保障,以最大限度地实现非子模式目标,但需通过标准和扭曲的本地搜索算法来任意设定非子模式限制。我们保证只要$\gamma$为中等大,就能改善艺术状态,并且同意当$\gamma=1美元时已知的亚模式目标保障。作为动机,我们既考虑子选择问题,又考虑Bayesian A-opmatimal 线性回归设计问题,这两个问题以前都是在薄弱亚模式性背景下研究的。我们表明,这些问题都满足了我们近似亚模式的互补概念,也允许我们应用新的保障。