Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) play an important role in the Evidence-Based Software Engineering scenario. With the advance of the computer science field and the growth of research publications, new evidence continuously arises. This fact impacts directly on the purpose of keeping SLRs up-to-date which could lead researchers to obsolete conclusions or decisions about a research problem or investigation. Creating and maintaining SLRs up-to-date demand a significant effort due to several reasons such as the rapid increase in the amount of evidence, limitation of available databases and lack of detailed protocol documentation and data availability. Conventionally, in software engineering SLRs are not updated or updated intermittently leaving gaps between updates during which time the SLR may be missing important new research. In order to address these issues, we propose the concept, process and tooling support of Continuous Systematic Literature Review (CSLR) in SE aiming to keep SLRs constantly updated with the promotion of open science practices. This positional paper summarizes our proposal and approach under development.
翻译:系统文学审查(SLR)在循证软件工程设想中发挥了重要作用。随着计算机科学领域的进步和研究出版物的增加,新的证据不断出现。这一事实直接影响到不断更新SLR的目的,使研究人员能够就研究问题或调查作出过时的结论或决定。建立和维持系统文学审查(SLR)由于证据数量迅速增加、现有数据库有限以及缺乏详细的协议文件和数据提供等若干原因作出了重大努力。在软件工程方面,SLR没有不断更新或不断更新,使更新工作在更新工作之间留下间歇性的差距,而在此期间,SLR可能缺少重要的新研究。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了在SE的连续系统文学审查(CLR)的概念、过程和工具支持,目的是通过推广开放的科学实践不断更新SLRs。本立场文件总结了我们的提案和正在开发中的方法。