We present an annotation approach to capturing emotional and cognitive empathy in student-written peer reviews on business models in German. We propose an annotation scheme that allows us to model emotional and cognitive empathy scores based on three types of review components. Also, we conducted an annotation study with three annotators based on 92 student essays to evaluate our annotation scheme. The obtained inter-rater agreement of {\alpha}=0.79 for the components and the multi-{\pi}=0.41 for the empathy scores indicate that the proposed annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to a substantial to moderate agreement. Moreover, we trained predictive models to detect the annotated empathy structures and embedded them in an adaptive writing support system for students to receive individual empathy feedback independent of an instructor, time, and location. We evaluated our tool in a peer learning exercise with 58 students and found promising results for perceived empathy skill learning, perceived feedback accuracy, and intention to use. Finally, we present our freely available corpus of 500 empathy-annotated, student-written peer reviews on business models and our annotation guidelines to encourage future research on the design and development of empathy support systems.
翻译:我们提出了一种说明性方法,在学生编写的同行对德国商业模式的同行审评中体现情感和认知同情,我们提出了一个说明性计划,使我们能够根据三种类型的审评内容模拟情感和认知同情得分;此外,我们还根据92份学生论文,与3名注解员进行了注解研究,以评价我们的批注计划;获得的关于各组成部分的跨师间协议和关于同情得分的多 ⁇ 0.41表明,拟议的注解计划成功地引导说明者达成实质性到中度协议;此外,我们培训了预测性模型,以检测附加说明的同情结构,并将其嵌入适应性写作支持系统中,使学生获得独立于教员、时间和地点的个人同情回馈;我们在同侪学习活动中与58名学生一起评价了我们的工具,并发现对理解的同情学习技能、感知的反馈准确性和使用意向的有希望的结果;最后,我们介绍了我们可自由获得的500份关于商业模式的同情性、学生写同业审查以及我们鼓励今后对同情支持系统的设计和发展进行研究的批注准则。