Scientific publishing heavily relies on the assessment of quality of submitted manuscripts by peer reviewers. Assigning a set of matching reviewers to a submission is a highly complex task which can be performed only by domain experts. We introduce RevASIDE, a reviewer recommendation system that assigns suitable sets of complementing reviewers from a predefined candidate pool without requiring manually defined reviewer profiles. Here, suitability includes not only reviewers' expertise, but also their authority in the target domain, their diversity in their areas of expertise and experience, and their interest in the topics of the manuscript. We present three new data sets for the expert search and reviewer set assignment tasks and compare the usefulness of simple text similarity methods to document embeddings for expert search. Furthermore, an quantitative evaluation demonstrates significantly better results in reviewer set assignment compared to baselines. A qualitative evaluation also shows their superior perceived quality.
翻译:科学出版在很大程度上依赖同行审评员对提交的手稿质量的评估。指派一组匹配审评员对提交材料进行匹配是一项非常复杂的任务,只能由域专家来完成。我们引入了 " RevASIDE " 审评员建议制度,即从预先界定的候选人人才库中指派合适的一组补充审评员,而不需要人工界定审评员的简介。在这方面,适合性不仅包括审评员的专门知识,也包括他们在目标领域的权威、他们在专长和经验领域的多样性,以及他们对手稿专题的兴趣。我们为专家搜索和审评员的指定任务提供了三个新的数据集,并将简单文本相似的方法与嵌入专家搜索的文件的效用进行比较。此外,定量评估表明,与基线相比,审评员的指定任务取得了显著更好的结果。定性评估还表明,其质量高。