Understanding the attitudes expressed in texts, also known as stance detection, plays an important role in systems aiming to detect false information online, be it misinformation (unintentionally false) or disinformation (intentionally false, spread deliberately with malicious intent). Stance detection has been framed in different ways in the literature, including (a) as a component of fact-checking, rumour detection, and detecting previously fact-checked claims, or (b) as a task in its own right; and here we look at both. While there have been prior efforts to contrast stance detection with other related tasks such as argumentation mining and sentiment analysis, there has been no survey examining the relationship between stance detection and mis- and disinformation detection. Here we aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we review and analyse existing work in this area, with mis- and disinformation in focus, and then we discuss lessons learnt and future challenges.
翻译:理解文本中表达的态度,也称为 " 立场探测 ",在旨在发现网上虚假信息的系统中发挥着重要作用,无论是错误信息(无意虚假)还是虚假信息(故意虚假,故意恶意传播),文献中以不同方式界定了 " 态度探测 ",包括(a) 作为核实事实、发现谣言和发现先前经事实核实的主张的一个组成部分,或(b)作为本身的任务,或(b)作为本身的一项任务;这里我们审视两者。虽然以前曾努力将立场探测与诸如辩证挖掘和情绪分析等其他相关任务加以对比,但迄今没有调查检查立场探测与错误和虚假信息探测之间的关系,我们在这方面的目标是弥合这一差距,特别是我们以错误和错误信息为重点审查和分析这一领域现有的工作,然后讨论经验教训和今后的挑战。