We investigate both theoretically and numerically the consistency between the nonlinear discretization in full order models (FOMs) and reduced order models (ROMs) for incompressible flows. To this end, we consider two cases: (i) FOM-ROM consistency, i.e., when we use the same nonlinearity discretization in the FOM and ROM; and (ii) FOM-ROM inconsistency, i.e., when we use different nonlinearity discretizations in the FOM and ROM. Analytically, we prove that while the FOM-ROM consistency yields optimal error bounds, FOM-ROM inconsistency yields additional terms dependent on the FOM divergence error, which prevent the ROM from recovering the FOM as the number of modes increases. Computationally, we consider channel flow around a cylinder and Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, and show that FOM-ROM consistency yields significantly more accurate results than the FOM-ROM inconsistency.


翻译:我们从理论上和数字上调查非线性离散式全序模型(FOMS)和减序型模型(ROMs)在不可压缩流动方面的一致性,为此,我们考虑两种情况:(一) FOM-ROM一致性,即在FOM和ROM中使用同样的非线性离散式;和(二) FOM-ROM不一致,即在FOM和ROM中使用不同的非线性离散型。从分析上看,我们证明FOM-ROM一致性产生最佳误差界限,而FOM-ROM不一致则产生取决于FOM差差错的额外条件,这使得ROM无法随着模式数量的增加而恢复FOM。我们计算,我们考虑在圆筒和Kelvin-Helmholtz周围的通道流动,并表明FOM-ROm一致性产生比FOM-ROm不一致性更准确的结果。

0
下载
关闭预览

相关内容

【图与几何深度学习】Graph and geometric deep learning,49页ppt
Fariz Darari简明《博弈论Game Theory》介绍,35页ppt
专知会员服务
110+阅读 · 2020年5月15日
强化学习最新教程,17页pdf
专知会员服务
174+阅读 · 2019年10月11日
【哈佛大学商学院课程Fall 2019】机器学习可解释性
专知会员服务
103+阅读 · 2019年10月9日
已删除
将门创投
4+阅读 · 2019年4月1日
VIP会员
相关资讯
已删除
将门创投
4+阅读 · 2019年4月1日
Top
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员