The development of privacy-enhancing technologies has made immense progress in reducing trade-offs between privacy and performance in data exchange and analysis. Similar tools for structured transparency could be useful for AI governance by offering capabilities such as external scrutiny, auditing, and source verification. It is useful to view these different AI governance objectives as a system of information flows in order to avoid partial solutions and significant gaps in governance, as there may be significant overlap in the software stacks needed for the AI governance use cases mentioned in this text. When viewing the system as a whole, the importance of interoperability between these different AI governance solutions becomes clear. Therefore, it is imminently important to look at these problems in AI governance as a system, before these standards, auditing procedures, software, and norms settle into place.
翻译:隐私增强技术的发展大大降低了数据交换和分析中隐私和性能之间的权衡。类似的工具可用于结构透明度,通过提供外部审查、审计和源验证等功能,为AI治理提供帮助。为避免治理中出现重要差距,有必要将这些不同的AI治理目标视为一种信息流系统。因为在这些AI治理用例中,所需的软件栈可能存在重叠。当整个系统作为一个整体来看,AI治理解决方案之间的互操作性变得更加重要。因此,在这些标准、审计程序、软件和规范定型之前,有必要将AI治理问题视为一个系统来看待。